The Real Reason Your Team Isn't Listening (And It's Not What You Think)

Connect with us: SB Nation | Reddit | Pexels | Medium | Inkitt

Three months ago, I watched a perfectly competent Brisbane manager completely destroy a team meeting by doing everything the textbooks said was right. Perfect eye contact, clear objectives, structured agenda - the works. Twenty minutes in, half the room was checking phones and the other half had that glazed look you get watching paint dry.

The problem wasn't his technique. It was that he was speaking corporate whilst his team was thinking human.

After fifteen years running communication workshops across Australia, I've seen this same scenario play out in boardrooms from Perth to Sydney. We've got managers who've read all the books, attended all the seminars, and still can't figure out why their carefully crafted messages land with the impact of a wet lettuce.

The Listening Crisis Nobody's Talking About

Here's something that'll ruffle feathers: most communication training is backwards. We spend 80% of our time teaching people how to speak and maybe 20% on how to listen. Then we wonder why workplace communication resembles a bunch of people taking turns to broadcast at each other.

I blame the Americans for this one. Don't get me wrong - Yanks are brilliant at a lot of things, but they've exported this idea that communication is about being heard rather than understanding. We've imported their confidence-first approach without their cultural context, and it's creating a generation of Australian workers who can present brilliantly but couldn't have a genuine conversation if their bonus depended on it.

Real listening - the type that actually changes outcomes - happens when you stop waiting for your turn to speak and start getting curious about what's happening in the other person's head. Effective communication training should focus on this foundation before touching presentation skills.

Why Your Open Door Policy Is Actually Closing Doors

Every second manager I meet brags about their "open door policy." They say it with the same pride someone might announce they've discovered gravity. Here's the uncomfortable truth: an open door without the right communication climate is just a room people avoid walking into.

Sarah (not her real name) ran operations for a mid-sized logistics company in Melbourne. Lovely person, genuinely cared about her team, had that open door thing happening. Problem was, every conversation that walked through that door got the same treatment - solution mode activated, advice dispensed, problem solved. Next!

Her people learned pretty quickly that bringing problems to Sarah meant getting told what to do rather than being heard. The door stayed open, but the real conversations happened in the carpark.

The shift happened when she started asking different questions. Instead of "Have you tried...?" she began with "What's your take on this?" Instead of jumping to solutions, she got curious about context. Revolutionary stuff, really.

Takes practice, though. Most of us are so programmed to fix things that we forget sometimes people just need to think out loud before they can move forward.

The Meeting Epidemic That's Killing Productivity

Let's talk about meetings for a minute. Australia has a serious meeting addiction, and I'm not just talking about the obvious time-wasters. I mean the well-intentioned, properly structured, carefully planned meetings that somehow suck the life out of everyone involved.

The problem isn't usually the agenda. It's that we've forgotten how to have conversations.

I was working with a tech company in Adelaide last year - smart people, good intentions, meetings that felt like diplomatic negotiations. Everything was so carefully worded, so politically correct, so bloody professional that nothing real ever got said. They were communicating in corporate speak while the actual work happened in Slack channels and informal chats.

Here's what I learned watching them transform: workplace communication training works best when it focuses on permission rather than technique. Permission to disagree respectfully. Permission to say "I don't understand." Permission to admit when something isn't working.

The moment they started having actual conversations instead of performing meetings, productivity jumped. Not because they were more efficient, but because they stopped wasting energy on communication theatre.

The Feedback Problem Everyone Pretends Doesn't Exist

Feedback. The word alone makes most people reach for their stress balls. We've turned what should be natural human conversation into this formal, scheduled, anxiety-inducing process that helps nobody.

I've sat through feedback sessions that felt like performance reviews designed by robots. "Your communication could be more impactful." What does that even mean? Impact on what? Measured how? It's like telling someone their driving could be more vehicular.

Real feedback happens in the moment, focuses on behaviour rather than personality, and assumes good intent. It's not "You need to communicate better," it's "When you cut me off in that meeting, I felt like my input wasn't valued. Was that your intention?"

But here's where it gets interesting. The best communicators I know don't give feedback - they create conditions where honest conversation becomes natural. They model the vulnerability they want to see. They ask questions that make people think rather than statements that make people defensive.

This might sound touchy-feely, but it's actually the most practical approach I've found. Trying to fix communication problems with more communication rules is like trying to fix traffic jams with more traffic lights.

Technology Is Making Us Worse at Being Human

Email was supposed to make us more efficient. Slack was going to improve collaboration. Video calls would bridge the distance gap. Instead, we've created a generation of workers who can craft perfect written communication but struggle with spontaneous conversation.

I watch people in meetings who can write brilliant emails stumble through basic verbal interactions. They've become so dependent on the edit button that real-time communication feels foreign.

The irony is that technology could actually help if we used it differently. Instead of hiding behind screens, use them as practice grounds. Record yourself explaining complex ideas. Practice having difficult conversations over video calls where the stakes are lower. Communication skills training should include digital literacy as a foundation, not an afterthought.

But here's the thing - and this might be controversial - sometimes the best communication technology is a coffee machine and two chairs. Revolutionary concept, I know.

The Australian Context Nobody Mentions

We need to talk about cultural context for a minute. Australian workplace communication has its own rules, and they're not the same as what works in New York or London or Tokyo.

We're direct but not confrontational. We value authenticity but respect hierarchy. We'll call out BS but we'll do it with a smile. Importing communication frameworks from other cultures without adapting them is like trying to drive on the wrong side of the road - technically possible, just not very effective.

The tall poppy syndrome is real, and it affects how we communicate at work. People are hesitant to speak up not because they lack confidence, but because they don't want to be seen as showing off. Good communication training acknowledges this instead of pretending it doesn't exist.

I've seen American-style assertiveness training create more problems than it solved because it ignored the cultural context. Being assertive in Australia means something different than being assertive in America, and good luck explaining that in a global corporate training module.

What Actually Works (The Stuff They Don't Teach)

After all these years, here's what I've learned actually moves the needle:

Start with assumptions. Before any important conversation, get clear on what you're assuming about the other person's intentions, knowledge, and priorities. Half of communication problems are assumption problems.

Practice the pause. The space between someone finishing their sentence and you starting yours is where understanding lives. Most people are already formulating responses before the other person stops talking.

Get comfortable with confusion. "I'm not following you" is one of the most powerful phrases in communication. Most people would rather pretend they understand than admit confusion.

Focus on one thing. Every conversation should have one primary purpose. If you're trying to give feedback AND ask for a favour AND share information, you're having three conversations badly instead of one conversation well.

The best communicators I know aren't the most articulate or the most confident. They're the most curious. They ask better questions. They listen for what's not being said. They create space for other people to think.

The ROI Reality Check

Let's get practical for a minute. Companies spend thousands on communication training and then wonder why nothing changes. The problem isn't the training content - it's the implementation strategy.

Real communication improvement happens through practice, not theory. You can't workshop your way to better communication any more than you can read your way to being a better tennis player. You need reps, feedback, and time to develop muscle memory.

The organisations that see actual ROI from communication training are the ones that treat it like skill development rather than information transfer. They create practice opportunities, reward vulnerability, and measure progress through behaviour change rather than satisfaction surveys.

Where to From Here?

Here's the thing about communication - everyone thinks they're better at it than they actually are. It's like driving or parenting or making coffee. We've all been doing it for years, so we assume we're competent.

But communication isn't just about getting your point across. It's about creating understanding, building relationships, and making work feel more human. And that requires intentional practice, honest feedback, and the humility to admit when we're getting it wrong.

The managers who get this right aren't necessarily the most charismatic or articulate. They're the ones who create environments where real conversation can happen. Where people feel heard before they feel helped. Where feedback feels like partnership rather than performance review.

If you're serious about improving workplace communication, start with listening. Not the polite nodding kind of listening, but the genuinely curious kind. The kind that changes you as much as it changes the other person.

Because at the end of the day, communication isn't about being right or being heard. It's about being human in a world that seems designed to make us forget how.

And that's something worth practicing.